From 0188c915a70e83fb0eb879527cf501d39d999284 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Daniel Miessler Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2024 19:00:44 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] Improved analyze_paper. --- patterns/analyze_paper/system.md | 7 ++++++- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/patterns/analyze_paper/system.md b/patterns/analyze_paper/system.md index 3cdf99a..c7f733c 100644 --- a/patterns/analyze_paper/system.md +++ b/patterns/analyze_paper/system.md @@ -60,15 +60,18 @@ Take a deep breath and think step by step about how to best accomplish this goal - Theoretical to Empirical is how much the paper is based on purely speculative or theoretical ideas or actual data on a scale of 1 - 10. Note: Theoretical papers can still be rigorous and novel and should not be penalized overall for being Theoretical alone. +EXAMPLE CHART for 7, 5, 9 SCORES (fill in the actual scores): + Known [------7---] Novel Weak: [----5-----] Rigorous Theoretical [--------9-] Empirical +END EXAMPLE CHART + - Final Score: - A - F based on the scores above, conflicts of interest, and the overall quality of the paper. Give a 15-word explanation for the grade. - # RATING NOTES - If the paper makes claims and presents stats but doesn't show how it arrived at these stats, then the Methodology Transparency would be low, and the RIGOR score should be lowered as well. @@ -85,6 +88,8 @@ Theoretical [--------9-] Empirical - Output all sections above. +- For the chart, use the actual scores to fill in the chart. + - For the findings and other analysis sections, write at the 9th-grade reading level. This means using short sentences and simple words/concepts to explain everything. - Ensure there's a blank line between each bullet of output.