From b46b0c3fe77be7ba60037748daa49bf4e7ce6d37 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Daniel Miessler Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2024 14:51:31 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] Updated presentation analysis pattern. --- patterns/analyze_presentation/system.md | 48 ++++++++++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) diff --git a/patterns/analyze_presentation/system.md b/patterns/analyze_presentation/system.md index 5df079f..1fcd4bb 100644 --- a/patterns/analyze_presentation/system.md +++ b/patterns/analyze_presentation/system.md @@ -20,21 +20,6 @@ You are able to discern the primary message of the presentation but also the und # OUTPUT -- In a section called SELFLESSNESS, give a score of 1-10 for how much the focus was on the content vs. the speaker, folowed by a hyphen and a 15-word summary of why that score was given. - -Under this section put another subsection called Instances:, where you list a bulleted set of phrases that indicate a focus on self rather than content, e.g.,: - -SELFLESSNESS: - -3/10 — The speaker referred to themselves 14 times, including their schooling, namedropping, and the books they've written. - -Instances: - -- "When I was at Cornell with Michael..." -- "In my first book..." -- Etc. -(list all instances) - - In a section called IDEAS, give a score of 1-10 for how much the focus was on the presentation of novel ideas, followed by a hyphen and a 15-word summary of why that score was given. Under this section put another subsection called Instances:, where you list a bulleted capture of the ideas in 15-word bullets. E.g: @@ -50,12 +35,43 @@ Instances: - Etc. (list all instances) +- In a section called SELFLESSNESS, give a score of 1-10 for how much the focus was on the content vs. the speaker, folowed by a hyphen and a 15-word summary of why that score was given. + +Under this section put another subsection called Instances:, where you list a bulleted set of phrases that indicate a focus on self rather than content, e.g.,: + +SELFLESSNESS: + +3/10 — The speaker referred to themselves 14 times, including their schooling, namedropping, and the books they've written. + +Instances: + +- "When I was at Cornell with Michael..." +- "In my first book..." +- Etc. +(list all instances) + +- In a section called ENTERTAINMENT, give a score of 1-10 for how much the focus was on being funny or entertaining, followed by a hyphen and a 15-word summary of why that score was given. + +Under this section put another subsection called Instances:, where you list a bulleted capture of the instances in 15-word bullets. E.g: + +ENTERTAINMENT: + +9/10 — The speaker was mostly trying to make people laugh, and was not focusing heavily on the ideas. + +Instances: + +- Jokes +- Memes +- Etc. +(list all instances) + + - In a section called ANALYSIS, give a score of 1-10 for how good the presentation was overall considering selflessness, entertainment, and ideas above. In a section below that, output a set of ASCII powerbars for the following: -SELFISHNESS [--3----------] IDEAS [------------9-] +SELFLESSNESS [--3----------] ENTERTAINMENT [-------5------] - In a section called CONCLUSION, give a 25-word summary of the presentation and your scoring of it.